Why Is There Concern
About Pesticides in Drinking Water?
Pesticides pose a health threat not only because of their
toxicity, but also because of their widespread use in the U.S.
There are now about 21,000 registered pesticide products,
with almost 900 active ingredients. In a typical year, about
1.2 billion pounds of conventional pesticides and other
chemicals are used in the U.S. for pest control in agriculture,
residences, industrial, and commercial settings.
1 As a resultof their extensive use over the last half-century, pesticides
are ubiquitous in our environment, and human exposure is
virtually inevitable. National population-based surveys of
pesticide urinary metabolites in adults indicate widespread
exposure to pesticides.
2,3,4Drinking water can be a significant source of chronic
pesticide exposure, especially in agricultural regions where
large quantities of pesticides are used.
5 Researchers at theU.S. Geological Survey (USGS) found pesticides in more
than 95% of stream samples and almost 50% of ground water
samples collected throughout the U.S.
6 Ground watercontamination is critically important because 38% of the
water used for public water supplies is obtained from ground
water sources.
7 The USGS investigation also found that peakseasonal surface water concentrations of pesticides frequently
exceeded federal drinking water standards in agricultural
areas.
6 Levels and occurrence of pesticides in surface waterand ground water vary considerably with the seasons and
local geology, with highest concentrations often occurring
in spring and early summer following rainfall.
8,9What Are the Health Effects of Pesticides?
For many pesticides, our understanding of human health
effects is based largely on occupational or accidental
exposures, or laboratory animal studies, in which doses can
be relatively high. Effects such as weight loss, organ damage,
muscle degeneration, neurological damage, and cancer have
been documented based on such studies. In fact, more than
160 pesticide active ingredients have been classified as known
or suspected carcinogens by EPA and other organizations.
10However, environmental exposures to pesticides, such as
through drinking water, usually involve relatively low
concentrations that may occur over long periods of time.
While the human health effects associated with chronic, lowlevel
pesticide exposures are not yet well understood, a
growing body of scientific evidence suggests that
environmental pesticide exposures are associated with
neurological and reproductive damage, effects on growth
and development, birth defects, endocrine disruption, cancer,
and other adverse effects.
Given the ubiquitous nature of pesticides in our
environment, this emerging evidence raises serious public
health concerns. Every effort must be made to use
precautionary strategies to minimize or prevent pesticide
exposures while further evidence is collected through
research. This fact sheet summarizes health effects
information for many of the most commonly found pesticides
in public drinking water supplies, and offers suggestions on
ways that health professionals can help to reduce this public
health threat.
Triazine Herbicides
The triazine class of pesticides includes some of the most
widely used agricultural herbicides, including atrazine and
simazine. Atrazine has been found in up to 97% of surface
water-supplied drinking water systems in Midwestern states.
5(Table 1). A study by the Environmental Working Group
estimated that atrazine contaminates tap water delivered to
10.4 million people in seven Midwestern states.
11The triazine pesticides simazine, cyanazine, and propazine
are classified as “possible human carcinogens” by the EPA.
Atrazine was also in the same category until it was recently
downgraded by the EPA to “not likely to be a human
carcinogen.”
12 The International Agency for Research onCancer (IARC) has stated that atrazine “is not classifiable as
to its carcinogenicity in humans,” but that there is “sufficient
evidence in experimental animals for carcinogenicity of
atrazine.”
13 Recent studies have suggested a possibleassociation between exposure to triazine herbicides in
drinking water and increased risk for breast cancer
14 andstomach cancer.
15 There is also limited epidemiologicalevidence of associations between triazine pesticide exposure
and ovarian cancer and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.
According to EPA, lifetime exposure to atrazine at levels
above the drinking water standard has the potential to cause
weight loss; cardiovascular damage; retinal and some muscle
degeneration; and mammary tumors.
17 Atrazine has also beenshown to cause chromosomal damage at low concentrations
(comparable to the EPA drinking water standard) in animal
cell cultures.
18 Several recent studies have added to theevidence that atrazine and other triazine herbicides are
endocrine disruptors.
19,20,21 Long-term human exposure tosimazine can cause tremors; damage to testes, kidneys, liver,
and thyroid; gene mutations and cancer.
22 Anepidemiological study in Iowa found an association between
maternal exposure to triazine herbicides in drinking water
and intrauterine growth retardation and low birth weight.
23(See PSR’s drinking water fact sheet on atrazine for further
information about this particular pesticide).
Chlorophenoxy Herbicides
Chlorophenoxy herbicides are widely used for control of
broadleaf weeds in agriculture; control of vegetation along
roadsides, railways, and utility rights-of-way; and
maintenance of parks, golf courses, and home lawns and
gardens. The chlorophenoxy herbicides 2,4-D and dicamba
are among the most commonly occurring pesticides found
by EPA in U.S. public drinking water systems.
5 (Table 1).According to EPA, chronic exposure to 2,4-D above the
federal drinking water standard has the potential to cause
damage to the nervous system, kidneys, and liver.
24Agricultural use of 2,4-D has also been linked to mortality
from several types of cancer,
25,26 although EPA has classified2,4-D as having “inadequate evidence for carcinogenicity
in humans.” Epidemiological studies have also reported
an association between exposure to 2,4-D and non-
Hodgkin’s lymphoma.
27,28 Chronic exposure to 2,4-D hasalso been linked to immune system suppression
29,30 andendocrine disruption.
31Organochlorine Insecticides
The organochlorine insecticides aldrin and dieldrin were
widely used in the U.S. from the 1950s to the early 1970s.
Most uses for aldrin and dieldrin were banned in 1975, based
on potential for carcinogenicity in humans, and they are no
longer produced in the U.S. Lindane has not been produced
in the U.S. since 1977, but is still imported for restricted
uses. Despite these restrictions, organochlorine insecticides
are still found in drinking water supplies (Table 1) because
they are highly resistant to degradation in the environment.
These insecticides have been associated with lymphoma,
leukemia, soft tissue sarcoma, neuroblastoma, and cancers
of the pancreas, breast, and lung.
32,33 A number of otherhealth effects have been associated with chronic exposure
to organochlorine insecticides. Animal studies suggest that
these compounds may cause birth defects and may decrease
fertility.
34 Long-term exposure can cause liver damage,33, 35and lindane has shown endocrine-disrupting properties.
36,37,38Organophosphate Insecticides
and Other Pesticides
In addition to the pesticides described above, a wide variety
of other pesticides commonly contaminate treated drinking
water and water sources. The herbicides alachlor and
metolachlor have been frequently detected in public drinking
water derived from surface water.
5 According to USGS data,certain organophosphate insecticides, including chlorpyrifos,
diazinon, and malathion, are commonly found in streams
and rivers, but are not often detected in ground water.
39Despite their frequent occurrence as surface water
contaminants, EPA has not established drinking water
maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for these insecticides
and does not require that they be monitored in public water
supplies. Many of the long-term health effects of low-dose
exposure to these chemicals are not yet known. However,
the failure to monitor and regulate these chemicals
in drinking water raises serious public health concerns, given
the potential for these chemicals to cause effects such as
cancer, birth defects, behavioral effects, and neurological
damage.
Are Pesticides of Greater
Concern to Certain Populations?
Studies have shown that resident farm families, farm workers,
and their children are among those most highly exposed to
pesticides.
40 However, populations such as pregnant women,infants, and children may be more susceptible to the adverse
effects of pesticides than the general population. Infants that
are fed formula reconstituted with contaminated tap water may
be at significant health risk, particularly in areas of the Midwestern
U.S. where tap water contamination with herbicides is
common.
11 There is also evidence to suggest that children maybe at increased risk of cancer from pesticide exposure.
32, 41Children are disproportionately exposed to pesticides
because they eat and drink more than adults in relation to
their body weights.
42 Behaviors such as crawling and handto-mouth contact by toddlers and young children can also
increase exposure to pesticides in the home. In a
comprehensive evaluation of childhood pesticide exposure,
a committee of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS)
concluded in 1993 that there are significant differences in
the toxicity of pesticides between children and adults.
Children have immature metabolic systems and are generally
less able than adults to detoxify pesticides. The NAS
committee also determined that, on occasion, childhood
exposures to pesticides through food and diet can exceed
safe levels.
Table 1. Commonly Occurring Pesticides
in U.S. Public Drinking Water Systems
(Based on data presented in U.S. EPA report, A Review of Contaminant Occurrence
in Public Water Systems, Office of Water, November 1999)
How Are Pesticides Regulated
in Drinking Water?
EPA does not regulate levels of many pesticides that
commonly occur in drinking water or source water. The EPA
has developed MCLs for fewer than 25 registered pesticides.
In addition, MCLs are based on single chemical exposures
and may not adequately protect against adverse health effects
from exposure to mixtures of pesticides or pesticide
breakdown products. It is also important to recognize that
EPA does not regulate the quality of drinking water from
domestic wells. It is the responsibility of the homeowner to
have their water tested to ensure it is safe to drink.
The 1993 NAS review of children’s exposure to pesticides
resulted in the recommendation that EPA change its
decision-making process for establishment of acceptable
levels of pesticides in food, known as tolerances. Rather than
focusing on economics and agricultural practices, decisions
should be driven by health considerations. This
recommendation led to the enactment of the Food Quality
Protection Act (FQPA) in 1996. The FQPA requires that
food tolerances for pesticides take into account all exposures
to pesticides, including exposure via drinking water. Under
this law, aggregate exposure must be safe for infants and
children, and pesticide use on food crops is prohibited if the
risk from pesticides in drinking water exceeds the safety
standards set in the law. This law has particular significance
for areas of the Midwest where there is widespread
contamination of drinking water supplies by herbicides used
in agriculture.
43 In spite of unanimous Congressional passageof the FQPA, recent congressional sessions have seen
increasing support for industry-led attempts to dismantle
this important legislation.
What Can Health Professionals Do to Reduce
the Public Health Threat from Pesticides?
Urge parents who plan to bottle feed their infants and
live in areas where water contamination is known or
suspected to use ready-to-feed infant formula instead of
formula reconstituted with tap water.
Encourage patients who use private wells to have their water
tested for pesticide contamination. Local health
departments or EPA’s Safe Drinking Water Hotline can
direct well owners to certified laboratories that can perform
such tests. If contamination is found, home water filtration/
treatment units can be effective at removing pesticides and
other contaminants. Contact NSF International (listed
below) for information on certified products.
Encourage your patients to read and ask questions about
the Consumer Confidence Report from their water utility.
Educate yourself about known and suspected health
effects of pesticides to prepare yourself for questions from
patients.
Become involved in local, state, and national efforts to
prevent
pesticide contamination of surface water andground water. Urge your patients and your community
to use pesticides as a last defense against pests. Nonchemical
control methods and other sustainable
alternatives are available to meet many different needs. If
they do use pesticides in or around the house, urge them
to use caution and to carefully read product safety labels.
Become an advocate for stronger drinking water
protections. Press EPA and Congress to implement
health-protective standards for the many pesticides that
threaten our drinking water supplies. Advocate for
enactment of stronger drinking water “right-to-know”
provisions that will inform all consumers—in a timely
manner—about pesticide contamination in their drinking
water. Become involved in efforts to preserve the vital
health protections provided by the FQPA. For assistance
in your efforts, contact PSR for a copy of
From Knowledgeto Action: A Safe Drinking Water Advocacy Kit
.

当前位置: